Remote vs. RemoFirst: Which Global EOR Is Right for Your Business?

Two leading providers in this space are Remote and RemoFirst. Both offer end-to-end global employment solutions, but with different approaches to pricing, coverage, and operations.

Remote uses an owned-entity model, operating its own legal entities in most of the countries it serves. RemoFirst, by contrast, follows a partner-based model, allowing for broader geographic coverage and lower pricing through partnerships with in-country experts.

Both platforms make it easier for companies to hire and manage international teams, but they take different paths to get there. 

Remote’s owned-entity model gives it hands-on control in each country where it operates, while RemoFirst’s partner-based model focuses on flexibility, speed, and affordability across a wider global footprint. 

Here’s a closer look at how the two compare when it comes to pricing, coverage, and other key features.

‍

How Remote and RemoFirst Compare

‍

Remote at a Glance

Founded in 2019, Remote is known for building and maintaining its own legal entities in most of the countries where it operates. This model gives the company direct control over compliance and operations, offering consistency and visibility across its network. However, it also means less overall country coverage.

Remote’s EOR services cost $699 per employee/month, and its contractor management service is $29 per contractor/month.

The platform includes a wide range of HR tools and integrations, such as payroll, time off tracking, and benefits administration, along with features for managing global equity and stock options.

These features can be great for bigger, established companies, but smaller teams often find the platform more complex (and pricier) than what they need for basic global hiring.

‍

RemoFirst at a Glance

RemoFirst helps companies hire, onboard, manage, and pay team members in over 185 countries. Its broad coverage is made possible through partnerships with trusted local providers rather than owned entities, offering compliant and reliable operations with a wider global reach and less administrative overhead.

RemoFirst’s EOR plans start at $199 per employee/month and include all core features for employing and managing global talent. Contractor management is free for basic use (such as creating compliant contracts) and $25 per contractor/month for full management and payments.

While RemoFirst doesn’t have as many built-in integrations as other EORs, it offers a straightforward, easy-to-use platform and recently partnered with ADP Workforce Now^® to expand functionality.

RemoFirst’s support model centers on dedicated account managers who provide personalized assistance and faster response times compared to ticket-based systems.

‍

Key Differences to Consider

There are a few factors to consider when deciding which platform is the best fit for your organization:

• Coverage and Control: RemoFirst supports more countries through its partner network, while Remote’s owned-entity model covers fewer countries but gives it direct control over operations.
• Pricing: RemoFirst’s pricing starts lower and is fully transparent, while Remote’s rates are higher and may vary by service tier.
• Platform Features: Remote offers a more feature-rich platform with tools for payroll, equity, and benefits, whereas RemoFirst focuses on delivering core EOR and contractor management features with a simpler interface.
• Support Model: RemoFirst assigns dedicated account managers for direct, personalized support. Remote primarily uses a help center and ticket-based system.
• Integrations: Remote provides integrations with multiple HR and finance systems, while RemoFirst offers limited integrations but ongoing partnerships to extend functionality.
• Company Size and Needs: Remote’s broader HR feature set may appeal to larger enterprises, while RemoFirst’s simplicity and transparent pricing may be a better fit for startups and mid-size businesses scaling globally.

‍

Both Remote and RemoFirst provide comprehensive EOR solutions to help companies hire and manage employees around the world. Remote’s owned-entity model delivers greater control and deeper integration across HR functions, while RemoFirst’s partner-based approach offers broader coverage, simpler workflows, and more predictable pricing.

Ultimately, both platforms aim to make global employment easier and more compliant. The best fit depends on how your organization balances functionality, budget, and scale in its international hiring strategy.